Friday, April 29, 2011

Unit 4 Grading Rubric

Unit 4 Rubric (Argumentative Research Paper)

An “A” Paper…

· Efficiently introduces the issue addressed in the paper and provides adequate background information for that issue.

· Includes an effective thesis statement that:

o identifies the “who, what, where, when, & why” of the issue addressed; and

o makes an arguable claim about an issue.

· Supports this thesis logically throughout the paper by:

o identifying credible research/opinions that support the thesis and introducing those sources correctly;

o acknowledging credible research/opinions that do not match the thesis and introducing those sources correctly; and

o demonstrating how/why the thesis withstands opposing viewpoints.

· Builds the writer’s ethos by:

o including evidence of credible, pertinent research;

o using language and tone appropriate for the general academic audience; and

o demonstrating the writer’s ability to express an informed opinion without using first-person pronouns (I, me, my, mine, etc.).

· Cites all outside sources in the paper’s body and on the Works Cited page in MLA format.

· Includes a relevant and interesting title.

· Follows formatting guidelines (Times New Roman, double-spaced, 12 point, one-inch margins).

· Shows evidence of careful proofreading (almost no errors in spelling, usage, grammar, mechanics, etc.).

A “B” Paper…

· Introduces the issue addressed in the paper and provides adequate background information for that issue.

· Includes a strong thesis statement that makes an arguable claim about an issue.

· Supports this thesis throughout the majority of the paper in the ways listed above.

· Builds the writer’s ethos by:

o including evidence of credible, pertinent research;

o generally using language and tone appropriate for the g.a.a.; and

o avoiding first-person pronouns.

· Correctly cites all outside sources in the paper’s body and on the WC page.

· Includes a relevant title.

· Follows formatting guidelines.

· Has few errors in spelling, usage, grammar, mechanics, etc.

A “C” Paper…

· Introduces the issue and provides some background information, though this information may be either too little or too much.

· Includes a thesis statement that states the paper’s central argument.

· Generally supports this thesis in the body of the paper by:

o identifying research/opinions that match the thesis;

o acknowledging research/opinions that do not match the thesis; and/or

o attempting to show why the thesis withstands opposing viewpoints.

· Attempts to build the writer’s ethos by:

o demonstrating evidence of some credible and/or pertinent research;

o attempting the tone and language of scholarly writing; and

o largely avoiding first-person pronouns.

· Correctly cites all outside sources in the paper’s body and on the WC page.

· Includes a relevant title.

· Follows formatting guidelines.

· Has some errors in spelling, usage, grammar, mechanics, etc.; at times, these mistakes may detract from meaning.

A “D” Paper…

· Has an overly broad introduction or one that provides insufficient or irrelevant background information.

· Has no thesis statement, a thesis that does not match the paper, or a thesis statement that does not make an arguable claim.

· Generally does not support the thesis in the paper’s body OR includes body paragraphs that support contradicting points of view OR includes body paragraphs that lack a sense of controlling voice.

· Seriously harms the writer’s ethos by:

o demonstrating poor research skills and/or use of non-credible sources;

o failing to write in the language or tone appropriate for scholarly papers; and/or

o including first- and/or second-person pronouns.

· Incorrectly cites outside sources, either in the paper’s body or on the WC page.

· Has no title or an irrelevant title.

· Does not follow one or more formatting guideline.

· Has significant errors in spelling, etc.; these errors are often distracting.

An “F” Paper…

· Fails to meet minimum requirements; and/or

· Plagiarizes.

Thursday, April 28, 2011

Homework Due Tuesday, May 3, 2011

Bring a printed draft of your Unit 4 paper to class for peer review. Final copies are due Thursday.

Classwork, 4.28.11

Sample introduction:


In recent years, the popularity of undead creatures like zombies and vampires has skyrocketed in the United States. Some pop culture analysts attribute this trend to books like those in the Twilight series and to the type of communication facilitated by the Internet, which allows people with relatively niche tastes to congregate and interact easily. A closer analysis of cultural and economic factors in contemporary American society, though, suggests that the mania for the undead might be Americans’ way of claiming immortality as their culture—and nation—begins to fall from its position as the number one global superpower.

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Classwork, 4.26.11

With your partner, discuss and take notes on the following questions. Begin with the article assigned to you; if you finish early, move on to the second article.

  • What background information do the authors give for why this issue matters?
  • What terms do the authors define here? What definitions do they offer? Why are these definitions necessary to their arguments?
  • What opposing arguments do the authors present? How do they contradict these arguments?
  • What evidence do the authors offer to support their claims? What "experts" are referred to? Does the evidence feel sufficient to support their claims? How might they present a larger picture?
  • Most of you are in a position to be fairly knowledgeable about this issue. In your opinion, do these authors' portrayals of hook-up culture seem accurate? How does the definition of hooking up differ as you understand it? Are there any related issues involved in the hook-up culture that these authors don't mention?

Homework Due Thursday, April 28, 2011

1. Continue working on Unit 4 papers.
2. Email me two specific questions you have about the Unit 4 paper or two specific things about the Unit 4 paper that you are having difficulty with. I will be sure to include questions to address these issues in the peer review questions.
3. Peer review draft of your paper due Tuesday; final draft due at the beginning of class Thursday.

Final Exam Prompt

Final Exam

Throughout the semester, we have studied and practiced techniques for presenting and supporting arguments. In the next two hours, your assignment is to compose an essay in which you present an academic argument to me. In this argument, you should identify the grade you believe you have earned this semester and offer support for why I should (or should not) enter this grade on your transcript and, if necessary, identify (and provide supporting arguments for) what grade I should enter.

The Details:

This is not a vocabulary test; I am not interested in reading definitions of terms we have discussed since January. I will grade this essay based on the efficacy with which you implement the concepts named by those terms. I will also grade on the strength of your argument, including your use of claims and evidence, rhetorical appeals, structure, the written word (i.e. grammar, spelling, usage, punctuation, capitalization, etc.), and any other element of argumentation we have discussed in this class.

The goal of this essay is for you to show me that you have, in fact, absorbed the subject matter of this class and that you are capable of employing it to your benefit. I will take these arguments into consideration when I enter final grades. What does that mean? In the case of an excellently reasoned and written argument (say, one that argues for a student who has earned a C to be awarded a B), I may just agree to raise a grade.

Please note that I can and will not grade an essay that is illegible.

Bring to the Final:

· Blank, lined paper. Write on one side only and skip lines.

· A dark blue or black pen (I will not grade essays written in pencil).

· A dictionary.

· No more than one page of notes (if you wish).

Thursday, April 21, 2011

Homework Due Tuesday, April 26, 2011

1. Read "Dinner and a Movie?..." and "Hook-Up Culture" in Aims of Argument (510 - 516). Bring your texts to class.
2. Email me any questions you have about the Unit 4 paper.

Wednesday, April 20, 2011

Final Exam Information

Our final exam will be:

Tuesday, May 10, 2011 10:10 - 12:10 in Faner 2205.

Please note: The door will be shut and locked at 10:10; no late entrants will be permitted to take the final exam. I strongly suggest you arrive early and find the classroom before the day of the exam.

Tuesday, April 19, 2011

In-Class Activity: 4.19.11 (Scavenger Hunt)

Working in pairs, examine Braudy's article to find the following:

  1. Arguments of definition: what words, phrases, or concepts does he define? How does he define them?
  2. Background information: what does he tell his readers to contextualize his argument?
  3. Appeals to logos: Where does he make logical arguments or support claims with evidence? What are some examples of his claims and evidence?
  4. Arguments of fact: What facts (numerical, historical, etc.) does he present to support his argument? What facts has he left out?

Homework Due Thursday, April 21, 2011

For Thursday, please:

1. Read chapter 8 in EaA.
2. I have scheduled Thursday as an in-class work day: you may either work on your Unit 4 paper or your Unit 3 revisions. Please come prepared with any source material, drafts, and storage devices you need for those papers and any specific questions you have for me about them.

Thursday, April 14, 2011

In-Class Writing: 4.14.11

  1. List the groups and individuals who have some stake in the issue on which you’re writing your Unit 4 paper. Brainstorm as many as you can. (If you’re stuck with only a few, poke around online to see what you find.)
  2. Beside each individual or group, identify his/her position (or possible positions) on your issue. Be specific; “for” and “against” will not work.
  3. Finally, identify the values or beliefs that lead to each group’s position.

Example: Issue = Decreasing American meat and animal product consumption.

o Environmental activists: Support widespread education and facilitation efforts for decreasing animal product consumption to limit production of greenhouse gases

o Animal rights activists: Support decreased animal consumption to protect animals’ wellbeing

o Producers of meat and animal products: Object to efforts to decrease animal consumption, which could decrease their profitability

o Health experts: Support efforts to encourage those with hypertension, heart disease, and related conditions to decrease animal consumption for health reasons

o Politicians: In rural/farming states, likely opposed to decrease in production/consumption; in other states, likely opposed for potential to limit jobs; some green or health-conscious politicians would likely campaign to reduce consumption for reasons listed above

Homework Due Tuesday, April 19, 2011

For Tuesday, please:

1. Read “Terrorism as a Gender War” (369 in Aims of Argument) as an example of an argumentative essay. Be prepared to discuss its effectiveness of organization and supporting claims.
2. Continue working on your Unit 4 paper. Email me by Sunday with any questions you have about this paper.

Tuesday, April 12, 2011

Homework Due Thursday, April 14, 2011

For Thursday, please:

1. Read Chapter 7 in EaA.
2. Begin drafting your Unit 4 paper. In about one paragraph, discuss which of the two argument structures we outlined in class today (and which are outlined in Chapter 7 of EaA) would best suit your paper and why.

Classwork, 4.12.11

In-class writing:

Consider the following arguable claim: All college and professional athletes should be drug tested at random throughout their careers to deter them from doping and thus to preserve the purity of competition for all players and fans.

o First, agree with this claim. Be as sympathetic to it as you can. Free-write for several minutes to brainstorm as many reasons as you can why this claim makes sense (consider financial, social, physiological, and other aspects of the issue).

o Now, disagree with the claim. Think of as many reasons as you can that this claim does not make sense or would not work.

Thursday, April 7, 2011

Classwork, 4.7.11

Please answer with your group members the following questions about your section of "The Beauty Myth."

o What arguable claims does Wolf make?
o What evidence does she offer to support these claims (you may have to look into surrounding sections)?
o What specific facets/sub-issues of the issue of the “beauty myth” does this section address?
o How would you more generally classify these sub-issues? (e.g. political, economical, sociological, relating to popular culture, psychological, etc.)

Section 1: Beginning - paragraph 6
Section 2: Paragraph 7 - 8
Section 3: Paragraph 9 - 14
Section 4: Paragraph 15 - 19
Section 5: Paragraph 20 - 22
Section 6: Paragraph 23 - end

Homework Due Tuesday, April 12, 2011

For Tuesday, please:
  1. Read ch. 6 in EaA for directions on developing an academic argument.
  2. Write a web or outline exploring specific issues and types of evidence that you might address in your Unit 4 paper. (Note: “Introduction” and “scientific evidence” are not considered specific; these are generic.)
  3. Write a thesis-type sentence for your Unit 4 paper in which you present the argument you would like to develop in this paper.

Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Classwork, 4.5.11 (part 2)

Now, revisit the arguments we just considered. Consider the issue from a different angle (that is, with a different set of underlying assumptions). Compose a new arguable claim about each issue that assumes the following.

  1. Americans are not responsible for global climate change or reducing hunger.
  2. Foreign language education is an inefficient way to spend money in a time of budget deficits.
  3. Anything that athletes to perform at a higher level should be encouraged to maximize the entertainment value of sports.
  4. Consuming unhealthy food is an individual choice and should not be regulated by the state

Classwork, 4.5.11

Specific, Arguable Claims in Academic Arguments

For each of the following claims, 1. identify any underlying assumptions, and 2. list examples of evidence that would be needed to support the claim. We will do the first sentence together.
  • Claim: Americans should reduce their consumption of meat and animal product by one-tenth to help address issues of climate change and global hunger.
  • Underlying assumption:
  • Evidence needed:
  1. Funding should be funneled toward foreign language education in elementary schools so that children have a better chance at becoming fluent and thus communicating with people from other cultures.
  2. Random drug tests should be conducted regularly in all professional and college sports to ensure purity of competition.
  3. States with budget deficits should place "sin taxes" on soda and junk food to both increase income and decrease health care costs.

Homework Due Thursday, April 7, 2011

For Thursday, please:

1. Closely read (ATTACK) "The Beauty Myth" by Naomi Wolf, pp. 612 - 621 in Aims of Argument. Pay particular attention to arguable claims she makes. Note any you notice.
2. Bring your Aims of Argument text to class.